With Selection Sunday this weekend, the 2023 NCAA Collegiate Basketball Tournament is about to begin. As faithful readers of this blog know, broadcasters, publishers and other businesses need to be wary about potential claims arising from their use of terms and logos associated with the tournament.
The NCAA owns the well-known marks March Madness®, The Big Dance®, Final Four®, Women’s Final Four®, Elite Eight,® and The Road to the Final Four® (with and without the word “The”), each of which is a federally registered trademark. The NCAA does not own “Sweet Sixteen” – someone else does – but it does have federal registrations for NCAA Sweet Sixteen® and NCAA Sweet 16®.
The NCAA also has federal registrations for some lesser-known marks, including March Mayhem®, March Is On®,Midnight Madness®, Selection Sunday®, 68 Teams, One Dream®, And Then There Were Four® and NCAA Fast Break®. (It also has a registration for SPRING MADNESS®in connectionwith its soccer tournaments.)
Some of these marks are used to promote the basketball tournament or the coverage of the tournament, while others are used on merchandise, such as t-shirts. The NCAA also uses (or licenses) variations on these marks without seeking registration, but it can claim common law rights in those marks, such as March Madness Live, March Madness Music Festival and Final Four Fan Fest.
The NCAA also has pending applications for the marks And Then There Were Eight, And Then There Were 8 and Four It All. Although there has not yet been any use of these marks, if they are ultimately registered, the NCAA will have priority over anyone using those marks after the filing dates of the applications. In other words, although the NCAA currently does not have any rights in these marks, anyone who chooses to use either mark runs a significant risk of liability down the line.
Although the NCAA may use the federal registration symbol (®) with any of its federally registered marks, it is not obligated to do so. Thus, it should not be assumed that the lack of the symbol with any particular trademark means that the NCAA is not claiming trademark rights.
The NCAA Aggressively Pursues Unauthorized Use of its Trademarks
The NCAA’s revenue from its annual basketball tournament is the primary source of its annual income. In 2022, its total revenue was $1.14 B and 85-90% of that came from the men’s tournament. Although this figure is marginally less than the revenue for 2021, historically, with the exception of 2020 when the tournament had to be cancelled, its revenues have grown each year.
For 2023, the licensing of television rights in the Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament will result in $870M in revenue for the NCAA. Although most of the NCAA’s tournament-related income is directly related to the games, it also has a substantial amount of revenue from licensing March Madness® and its other marks for use by advertisers. As part of those licenses, the NCAA agrees to stop non-authorized parties from using any of the marks. Indeed, if the NCAA did not actively police the use of its marks by unauthorized companies, advertisers might not feel the need to get a license or, at least, to pay as much as they do for the license. Thus, the NCAA has a strong incentive to put on a full court press to prevent non-licensees from associating their goods and services with the NCAA tournament through unauthorized use of its trademarks. The NCAA’s current statement regarding its Trademark Protection Program can be viewed here.
Accordingly, the NCAA is very serious about taking action against anyone who may try to trade off the goodwill in its marks — even if the NCAA’s actual marks are not used. For example:
- In 2017, the NCAA filed a trademark infringement action against a company that ran online sports-themed promotions and sweepstakes under the marks “April Madness” and “Final 3.” The defendant stipulated to an order providing that it would cease using those marks at least until the end of the year, but the order did not provide for dismissal of the case. The defendant failed to file an answer to the complaint and the NCAA was granted a default judgment, after which it filed a motion requesting an award of attorneys’ fees against the defendant in the amount of $242,213.55. In May 2018, the Court found the infringement to be willful and awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $220,998.05.
- The NCAA sued a car dealership that had registered and was using the mark “Markdown Madness” in advertising. (The case was settled.)
- Even schools that are part of the NCAA are not immune from claims of infringement. Seven years after the Big Ten Conference started using the mark “March Is On!,” the NCAA opposed an application to have that mark federally registered. (Ultimately, the opposition was withdrawn, the mark was registered, but the registration was assigned to the NCAA.)
- Just in the last twelve months, the NCAA has opposed or obtained extensions of time to oppose applications to register the following marks:
- STREET MADNESS (automobile shows and car meets)
- MARCH GREATNESS (charitable fundraising)
- MAD MARCH (advertising, marketing and promotional services)
- FINAL FRIDAY (bathrobes, masquerade costumes and various items of clothing, including sports jerseys)
- MAD IQ BASKETBALL BOARD GAME (board games and online games – this proceeding was resolved when the applicant agreed to exclude games relating to collegiate basketball tournaments)
- In addition, the NCAA currently has an extension of time to oppose an application to register MARSH MANIA (for seeds used to attract wildlife.
It should be noted that, before these marks were published for opposition, Trademark Attorneys at the PTO concluded that each of these marks was not confusingly similar to any registered marks.
These actions illustrate the level of importance that the NCAA places on acting against the use or registration of trademarks which it views as being likely to create an association with its annual Collegiate Basketball Tournament. Clearly, such activities carry great risks.
Tomorrow, I will provide some specific examples of actions built around the tournament that could attract the unwanted attention of the NCAA and one more issue to be considered in advertising or accepting advertising relating to the games.
Courtesy Broadcast Law Blog